. .
-> 13 DGW'ers + Bruno and Gabriel
-> 3x MCY / CHE / BOU (slim chance of a 2nd DGW) , 2x LEE / BRI
*Original post deleted as I had the wrong fixtures for the DGW
It’s the right screenshot for GW32?zipnolan wrote:Don't think you've posted the right screenshot?

3 x arse def is a waste. They don't have any doubles and Bournemouth will inevitably score against themjacksosi wrote:It’s the right screenshot for GW32?zipnolan wrote:Don't think you've posted the right screenshot?
Or do you mean it’s not showing the GW33 DGW fixtures? No idea how to do that
wow that big news Darlow not getting the 2 fixtures is it to give Perri a game before the FA Cupdanjones wrote: 09 Apr 2026, 12:58 Currently on WC:
Petrovic / Verbruggen
Gabriel / Hill / O'Reilly / Van Hecke / Justin
Fernandes / Semenyo / Palmer / Stach (if fit) / Sarr
Haaland / Pedro / Welbeck
Have read somewhere that Darlow may not get both fixtures, DCL is way out of form + Welbeck has a plum GW32 fixture. Justin likely playing wing back so may get an attacking return.
Don't have many saved transfers so getting Sarr in now with a decent GW32 fixture.
Hopefully Petrovic and Justin are sufficiently off-template GW33 for a marginal gain.
If Stach isn't fit, then could be Ampadu, or might do Welbeck to DCL + Mitoma.
Otherwise it's various combinations of template Senesi, Tavernier, Gross, DCL ,Darlow, Rodon - as Zipnolan said it's going to be a very template WC.
What's the logic behind this thought? With Isak back there's even less chance of him starting, isn't there?gray821 wrote: 09 Apr 2026, 19:07 My plan for WC was to go with Salah as a big differential…after mid week now that seems a bit weird. Surely he starts the home games at least??
Yeah I think it was also before the news that Isak was back. The thought process was that after the announcement of him leaving there’d be a heroic finish…especially in the home games. With Isak back, lack of form and not sure on a regular starting place it doesn’t stack up at all.hancockjr wrote: 09 Apr 2026, 19:50What's the logic behind this thought? With Isak back there's even less chance of him starting, isn't there?gray821 wrote: 09 Apr 2026, 19:07 My plan for WC was to go with Salah as a big differential…after mid week now that seems a bit weird. Surely he starts the home games at least??
yea your right thanksNorthBankRedemption wrote: 09 Apr 2026, 19:17 I wouldn’t be too keen to play goalkeeper roulette but I see the WC light on
I would and do have one premium and one dubravka. I’d keep one cheap doubler but also have a premium option to lean on the other week
darlow is tempting w fixtures but Leeds matches usually have goals for both sides.
No WCjacksosi wrote:Yeah, I'm starting to think I'm going to leave it, I have better GW32 squad than I would have with the WC.
I also have 10 already for GW34
Hence maybe I will play 32, FH 33, play 34 with 2 FT, then WC & BB 35+
From4corners wrote:Never considered the WC until 60 minutes ago. I decided to use my WC to get rid of doubts for this gameweek and navigating my squad through 33 and 34, ten transfers made, hereby trying to avoid a FH34 and keep that for a rainy day.
Good luck with the BBthebillfella wrote: 11 Apr 2026, 23:06 I think when you play the WC depends on if you also have the BB chip and when you think it holds most value.
If, like me, you think the BB will be more lucrative in DGW33 rather than SGW35 or DGW36 (no TC chip left as well then?) then the logical call IMO was WC32.
Will be interesting to see which one is more fortunate.
thebillfella wrote: 11 Apr 2026, 22:55From4corners wrote:Never considered the WC until 60 minutes ago. I decided to use my WC to get rid of doubts for this gameweek and navigating my squad through 33 and 34, ten transfers made, hereby trying to avoid a FH34 and keep that for a rainy day.
Screenshot_20260410-184258.png
Do you think it will get more rainy than GW34 then?!
FH this week then assuming you have enough in your squad for GW34, and WC35 / TC36?Oxford NZ wrote: 11 Apr 2026, 23:16Good luck with the BBthebillfella wrote: 11 Apr 2026, 23:06 I think when you play the WC depends on if you also have the BB chip and when you think it holds most value.
If, like me, you think the BB will be more lucrative in DGW33 rather than SGW35 or DGW36 (no TC chip left as well then?) then the logical call IMO was WC32.
Will be interesting to see which one is more fortunate.
I blew the BB a while ago, just to get rid of it, and ensure a promotion in the divisionals. I still have the FH, WC and 3xC.
Well cancelling thejacksosi wrote:No WCjacksosi wrote:Yeah, I'm starting to think I'm going to leave it, I have better GW32 squad than I would have with the WC.
I also have 10 already for GW34
Hence maybe I will play 32, FH 33, play 34 with 2 FT, then WC & BB 35+
Joao -> Bowen (plays 32 & 34), done
has paid off thankfully
right now.am the opposite my GW31 team would have scored 67 with Bruno to play while WC32 site only getting 54 + Bruno to play, but guessing 13 points hopefully get more than that for BB, yea also hoping Oreilly injury not serious cause any transfer to be make is catered for DGW36thebillfella wrote: 12 Apr 2026, 22:17 Conversely, subject to how Mbeumo does tomorrow, my WC32 team should outperform how my GW31 team would have performed this week even if I'd brought Bowen in for Ekitike, and now BB33/FH34 is set up pretty nicely (subject to O'Reilly's injury not being serious). Swings and roundabouts.