FISO

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 08:46**

It's not quite as simple as who scores the most points, as choosing one or the other changes pairs of picks and maybe formations, and I know some will be going for both, but who have you gone for and why?

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 09:15**

I've been on Diaz all pre-season until that CShield game. Robertson looked just as likely to register attacking returns.

If I wanted Reece James, I'd go Diaz however. I don''t want James yet though and there are a multitude of slightly cheaper mids to pick instead of Diaz.

Price points only interest me in Sky game, not FPL!

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 09:44**

Robertson for me. Only confirmed even more by his performance yesterday. Plus I am liking his potential to be a rare bit of a differential from the template at the start of the season.
Have TAA, Robertson and Salah from Liverpool. With so many other good midfield options at around 8.0 I prefer to spread the teams players I own in that role to capitalise on fixtures with the likes of Saka, Maddison or Mount

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 09:52**

I was on Diaz early, because I felt I needed someone at 8.0. I then realised that was false logic, as I will always need three Liverpool, so that 8.0 slot isn’t flexible at all if I put Diaz into it, just more expensive. The other thing to change my mind was the doubts we are all having about doubling up on James and Chilwell, which opened space for a premium defender.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 10:16**

Mav3rick wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 08:46 It's not quite as simple as who scores the most points, as choosing one or the other changes pairs of picks and maybe formations, and I know some will be going for both, but who have you gone for and why?

Which nutter is starting without both Salah and TAA?

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 12:24**

BLOCKHEAD wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 10:16
Mav3rick wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 08:46 It's not quite as simple as who scores the most points, as choosing one or the other changes pairs of picks and maybe formations, and I know some will be going for both, but who have you gone for and why?
Which nutter is starting without both Salah and TAA?

I think a fair few respected managers have touted going without Mo early on. (Mark Sutherns being one of them) So I think 'nutter' is a little too disrepectful, especially if it's just until the first WCard. If you play completely without FOMO, you can leave out almost any player. (I believe the winner of FPL a few years back left out 283 point RVP all season - that's probably more points than Salah will score) Playing the percentages is not always the move if you want to increase variance.

Salah is ahead of the rest on paper. He's not far ahead of the rest however. And Nunez could eat into his points - we just don't know and if Salah only manages 230 points this year, he's not worth it at 13mn imo. (and he's maxed at that in 2 out of 5 seasons)

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 12:30**

Sutter Kane wrote:
BLOCKHEAD wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 10:16
Mav3rick wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 08:46 It's not quite as simple as who scores the most points, as choosing one or the other changes pairs of picks and maybe formations, and I know some will be going for both, but who have you gone for and why?
Which nutter is starting without both Salah and TAA?
I think a fair few respected managers have touted going without Mo early on. (Mark Sutherns being one of them) So I think 'nutter' is a little too disrepectful, especially if it's just until the first WCard. If you play completely without FOMO, you can leave out almost any player. (I believe the winner of FPL a few years back left out 283 point RVP all season - that's probably more points than Salah will score) Playing the percentages is not always the move if you want to increase variance.

Salah is ahead of the rest on paper. He's not far ahead of the rest however. And Nunez could eat into his points - we just don't know and if Salah only manages 230 points this year, he's not worth it at 13mn imo. (and he's maxed at that in 2 out of 5 seasons)

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 12:34**

zipnolan wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 09:52 I was on Diaz early, because I felt I needed someone at 8.0. I then realised that was false logic, as I will always need three Liverpool, so that 8.0 slot isn’t flexible at all if I put Diaz into it

I think this is where I'm coming to, although its more about the pairs, it seems largely the case that however much cash you put into Liverpool assets, is realistically locked away until the wildcard (barring injury).

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 12:46**

Sutter Kane wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 12:24
BLOCKHEAD wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 10:16
Mav3rick wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 08:46 It's not quite as simple as who scores the most points, as choosing one or the other changes pairs of picks and maybe formations, and I know some will be going for both, but who have you gone for and why?
Which nutter is starting without both Salah and TAA?
I think a fair few respected managers have touted going without Mo early on. (Mark Sutherns being one of them) So I think 'nutter' is a little too disrepectful, especially if it's just until the first WCard. If you play completely without FOMO, you can leave out almost any player. (I believe the winner of FPL a few years back left out 283 point RVP all season - that's probably more points than Salah will score) Playing the percentages is not always the move if you want to increase variance.

Salah is ahead of the rest on paper. He's not far ahead of the rest however. And Nunez could eat into his points - we just don't know and if Salah only manages 230 points this year, he's not worth it at 13mn imo. (and he's maxed at that in 2 out of 5 seasons)

Isn't nutter a compliment for ingenious original thinking

Going without TAA is pushing things though

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 14:54**

Anyone going with Darwin instead?

(raises hand, with a feeling he is going to step up to boss level very quickly).

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 14:59**

From4corners wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 14:54 Anyone going with Darwin instead?

(raises hand, with a feeling he is going to step up to boss level very quickly).

He looked a better bet than Diaz, but I'm on Robbo.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 15:10**

I think he's risky to start with, but given how well Jota scored last season he's definitely an option. It's a fair chunk of change to find over Robertson or Diaz though, especially if you have Jesus too.

Maybe Darwin is once again going to be the Jesus killer though...

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 16:28**

From a combo perspective I prefer Robertson/Martinelli over Gabriel/Dias for the same price.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 16:42**

Is this conversation about a long term plan (say, after WC1), or from the start?

Not sure it changes anything, but interested to know anyway.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 16:50**

From4corners wrote:Anyone going with Darwin instead (raises hand, with a feeling he is going to step up to boss level very quickly).

His game does look as if it might evolve swiftly.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 17:00**

I think there are now decent arguments for TAA, Robbo, VVD, Matip (seems the clear first choice), Salah, Diaz, Darwin.

If Alisson is not back for GW1, might that skew the argument away from defence?

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 17:15**

I've been switching between the two with the emphasis on Robertson but am currently on neither. That could of course change.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 17:49**

Robbo and TAA are both excellent prospects at their prices, so why not both?

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 18:10**

HungryHungrySuarez wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 17:49Robbo and TAA are both excellent prospects at their prices, so why not both?

Maybe because some folks want Salah and Diaz?

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 18:26**

Bob Newhart wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 18:10
HungryHungrySuarez wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 17:49Robbo and TAA are both excellent prospects at their prices, so why not both?
Maybe because some folks want Salah and Diaz?

Sorry - it was a lazy comment. Apologies.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 19:03**

raoul wrote:I think there are now decent arguments for TAA, Robbo, VVD, Matip (seems the clear first choice), Salah, Diaz, Darwin.

If Alisson is not back for GW1, might that skew the argument away from defence?

Klopp said in the presser before CS;

"Ali trained today more than the day before, he will definitely be available for Fulham, but not for the weekend"

If that means to start or not is difficult to say atm, my guess is yes. Kelleher injured, and Adrian, despite some good saves, really struggle with his passing against City. Does not suite Liverpool to have a goalie so uncomfortable on the ball

Sent fra min SM-G981B via Tapatalk

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 20:38**

From4corners wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 14:54 Anyone going with Darwin instead?

Yep. It’s a natural selection.

TAA, Salah and Darwin are my Liverpool three.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 21:42**

Luxmonk wrote: ↑01 Aug 2022, 20:38 Yep. It’s a natural selection.

TAA, Salah and Darwin are my Liverpool three.

same three for me.

Posted: **01 Aug 2022, 23:11**

I have TAA, Robbo and Diaz

Decided against Salah this year

Posted: **02 Aug 2022, 08:47**

The way I'm looking at this now is Robertson/Mount vs James/Dias/£1.0m

I'd maybe use the £1.0m to upgrade my GK from Sanchez to Ederson, or upgrade the £8.0m MID to a £9.0m FWD and go 4-3-3.

A. Sanchez + Robertson + Mount [4-4-2]
B. Ederson + James + Dias [4-4-2]
C. Sanchez + James + Darwin [4-3-3]

FISO

Robertson or Diaz?

Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?

Re: Robertson or Diaz?