If Howard hadn't of bothered diving for it you maybe wouldn't of ended up with the 3 points.Malrom wrote:I'm still angry because of the "OWN" goal...
Week 18 KCs and MotM Dec 13th 16th 17th and 18th
-
- FISO Jedi Knight
- Posts: 21184
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:35
- Location: Waikikamukau
- FS Record: Small Profit
- Contact:
Didn't Howard get a hand to it in the first pla,ce, and knoked it onto th epostBramernic wrote:Why?Malrom wrote:I'm still angry because of the "OWN" goal...
Ballack's shot was off target, it hit the post. It only went in because it hit the keeper afterwards. That's a damn site clearer than a lot of the own goals that are given.
-
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 9367
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:45
- Location: Being PM'd
- FS Record: Better than most.
- Contact:
I think you may be right.anon1086 wrote:Didn't Howard get a hand to it in the first pla,ce, and knoked it onto th epostBramernic wrote:Why?Malrom wrote:I'm still angry because of the "OWN" goal...
Ballack's shot was off target, it hit the post. It only went in because it hit the keeper afterwards. That's a damn site clearer than a lot of the own goals that are given.
- reds363
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 5912
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:34
- FS Record: FPL 28th 06/07; TFFO 3rd 09/10; TFF 3rd 12/13
- FPL:
Can Bram/anyone clear the following up please?
A few weeks ago there was a huge argument over why Rooney didn't get a KC for being fouled for a penalty, the answer was quite correctly that even though he seemed to be in control of the ball he never touched it.
So why did Pennant not get a KC this week? He was clearly not in control I agree but by the previous argument the key factor is whether he touched the ball, which he clearly did.
A few weeks ago there was a huge argument over why Rooney didn't get a KC for being fouled for a penalty, the answer was quite correctly that even though he seemed to be in control of the ball he never touched it.
So why did Pennant not get a KC this week? He was clearly not in control I agree but by the previous argument the key factor is whether he touched the ball, which he clearly did.
- Bramernic
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 9204
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:26
- Location: Dartford, Kent
- FS Record: Plenty of super league prizes, nothing from the organisers.
- Contact:
- Judio
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 9636
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:28
- Location: Surrey
Howard should get some creditBramernic wrote:1) Ballack - Howard's hand touched the ball on the way back from the post.
2) Pennant - he'd headed the ball towards the goal before he was fouled so wasn't in posession at the time of the foul.
The slow motion showed he saved the free kick by tipping it onto the post.
The ball then came off the post and hit Howard on the back and went in
the net
Perhaps he should have twitched and the ball would have gone round the post
- Malrom
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 16240
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:43
- Location: Feet in Switzerland, Football heart in Leeds
- FPL:
- Contact:
- Crookface
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:33
- Location: Nuneaton
- FS Record: TFF 7thOverall 05/06, Winner MOTM Jan, Nov 07 - April 12. MOTW Winner 2012.
- FPL:
- Contact:
- Bunners
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 5938
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:26
- Location: feeling naked without my trophy
- FPL:
A little happier now that my tinker this evening kinda paid off, what with andy johnson not looking like hitting a cows backside witha banjo since I transferred him in about 9 games agoCrookface wrote:Assist in the Bag Bunners my old chum..Bunners wrote:viduku, not sure if the yak will et a kc as im not an expert on predicting these
- Bramernic
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 9204
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:26
- Location: Dartford, Kent
- FS Record: Plenty of super league prizes, nothing from the organisers.
- Contact:
- tedbull
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 8085
- Joined: 16 Jan 2006, 01:55
- FS Record: FPL 82nd 08/09
I do and I am!gilva18 wrote:You guessed wrong, I saw the whole game. I agree Lescott played well (and by the way, he did not attempt to block Lamps or Drogba's shots) (guess he is a bit slow) but if a team concedes 3 goals a defender simply should not get MOM. Did Lescott assist in any of Evertons goals? No!
I'm prepared to guess that you have blue blood and are rather bias!
By this rationale if a game finishes 0-0 only a defender can be the best player on the pitch as the strikers and midfielders failed in their primary aim - to create and score goals.
If a game finishes 1-0 then either the goalscorer or his defence can be MOM.
Personally, I'll stick with going for the best performance.
-
- Red & Blue Braces
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:27
Fair comment, enjoy your Everton mints from Santa at Christmas!!!tedbull wrote:I do and I am!gilva18 wrote:You guessed wrong, I saw the whole game. I agree Lescott played well (and by the way, he did not attempt to block Lamps or Drogba's shots) (guess he is a bit slow) but if a team concedes 3 goals a defender simply should not get MOM. Did Lescott assist in any of Evertons goals? No!
I'm prepared to guess that you have blue blood and are rather bias!
By this rationale if a game finishes 0-0 only a defender can be the best player on the pitch as the strikers and midfielders failed in their primary aim - to create and score goals.
If a game finishes 1-0 then either the goalscorer or his defence can be MOM.
Personally, I'll stick with going for the best performance.
- murf
- FISO Viscount
- Posts: 109449
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:28
- Location: here
- FS Record: Once led TFF. Very briefly.
- FPL:
- Contact:
- Bramernic
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 9204
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:26
- Location: Dartford, Kent
- FS Record: Plenty of super league prizes, nothing from the organisers.
- Contact:
View Latest: 1 Day View Your posts