523 - RMT

[mikemikemike]

been doing the math and this is the best i can do. what you guys think?

[boise1234]

It does have a bit of an "all eggs in liverpools defensive bucket" feel to it.

While Liverpools defence undoubtedly had a great year, their best in 40 years (0.56 goals conceded per game), since the days of Souness and Hansen.

If they can reproduce this historic, record breaking form you should be fine, but if they revert to their norm (1.03 goals concede per game over the last 25 years) then you could be in trouble

[dod]

I'm fine with the LIV defensive triple-up but your forward line concerns me. There are only 5 FWDs in the 7.5 > 9m price range and you have picked 3 of them. The other 2 both play for MUN. It doesn't leave you easy choices if one of them gets injured or is out of form. You are also going to have to be very creative with your captaincy choices.

I don't hate it but I think it could easily run into problems. Personally I'd lose one of the FWDs and upgrade one of your 4.5m MIDs at the very least.

[blahblah]

Or Sterling to KdB and Vardy to Kane?

Then it will be very similar to mine

[Aldershot Rejects]

been doing the math and this is the best i can do. what you guys think?

I think it's fine. As dod suggests, your structure limits your flexibility with respect to transfers and thus your ability to respond to events but if you plan an early wildcard that is probably not such a big issue. I'm starting with Wilson and Vardy and probably a 4.5m (bench) forward.

[DAREEL]

been doing the math and this is the best i can do. what you guys think?

My problem with it is the fact that Liverpool concede and Salah goes mad ( highly captained) you are off to a very bad start with no obvious Salah route. All ifs and buts but I'm a cautious player so that would be MY issue.

Great point by Dod though too