NFL chat 2018/19 season

[blahblah]

I usually have phone on Sky game for that (only £5 a month ) and a game of choice on laptop, but I'm zonked and just want 1 on laptop..

Maybe you're right, then hop to one.

[blahblah]

I've started in Cleveland

At Miami's 20 after 3 plays .... so I should be able to go elsewhere in a lil while.

[blahblah]

7 up in 5 mins.

At home to the Bengals should ice my cake in Sp4's Comp

[forestfan]

Just switched on and saw Trupicksky on typical form

[blahblah]

PFF really nailed him tbh and Bears as the new Jags.....

[forestfan]

James WINTston not to be outdone though... two thrown already.

[blahblah]

Baker hots another TD. Landry first then OBJ....

Losing to Denver was shocking and will be the one to cost them if they are 1 short of post season.

[blahblah]

21-0 so off to Philly just in time to see Wilson miss a ridiculously easily pass for a TD....

[forestfan]

21-0 so off to Philly just in time to see Wilson miss a ridiculously easily pass for a TD....

He could have run that in, I think he was in two minds for a moment... a bit like that Lucas Moura miss yesterday!

[blahblah]

21-0 so off to Philly just in time to see Wilson miss a ridiculously easily pass for a TD....

He could have run that in, I think he was in two minds for a moment... a bit like that Lucas Moura miss yesterday!

I was thinking Marlon Harewood

[forestfan]

21-0 so off to Philly just in time to see Wilson miss a ridiculously easily pass for a TD....

He could have run that in, I think he was in two minds for a moment... a bit like that Lucas Moura miss yesterday!

I was thinking Marlon Harewood

David Johnson’s partner in crime with us...

Bigger, just realised we’re on last year’s thread

[blahblah]

I did wonder when I replied.

I went back a page and scrolled up and saw a reminder of why I like the Browns

I think we had Marlon for a while

[blahblah]

Ertz has lacerated kidney too....

[blahblah]

Dead match and Cleveland are up...

[blahblah]

There is only one winner of SB after the QB's were picked for the 100....

[forestfan]

There is only one winner of SB after the QB's were picked for the 100....

Yeah, Rodgers has a point to prove

[blahblah]

There is only one winner of SB after the QB's were picked for the 100....

Yeah, Rodgers has a point to prove

Yep. They are who I have been avoiding mentioning. Your lot losing tonight would ice thst cake assuming GB get No1 seed.

Pats won't beat KC at home if they win this....

[forestfan]

There is only one winner of SB after the QB's were picked for the 100....

Yeah, Rodgers has a point to prove

Yep. They are who I have been avoiding mentioning. Your lot losing tonight would ice thst cake assuming GB get No1 seed.

But they’re losing to Bluff’s Pussycats...

I thought you were making the Brees point as per the NFL.com article (which I don’t think even mentioned Aa-Rod) hence why I twisted it in another direction...

[blahblah]

There is only one winner of SB after the QB's were picked for the 100....

Yeah, Rodgers has a point to prove

Yep. They are who I have been avoiding mentioning. Your lot losing tonight would ice thst cake assuming GB get No1 seed.

But they’re losing to Bluff’s Pussycats...

I thought you were making the Brees point as per the NFL.com article (which I don’t think even mentioned Aa-Rod) hence why I twisted it in another direction...

Brees is an odd one. His arm looked good the other week, but I think they need No 1 seed, which they can not get?

[forestfan]

I think if SF and GB lose then NO get #1 seed?

[blahblah]

Not Seattle?

[forestfan]

Not Seattle?

SEA lost last week so can only get to 12-4. NO will be 13-3.

[blahblah]

I was thinking of doing a mad spreadsheet to adjust for strengths of wins and losses but it will have to wait for next season as I need to understand vlookup or something

Strength of Victories us kinda flawed as it seems to be win percentage of those defeated divided by wins ie Bangles had .400 (before tonight's game) and .4 is the win percentage of the only rabble they have beaten.

[blahblah]

Not Seattle?

SEA lost last week so can only get to 12-4. NO will be 13-3.

Yes if you and Buck lose, I just checked....

[forestfan]

Not Seattle?

SEA lost last week so can only get to 12-4. NO will be 13-3.

Yes if you and Buck lose, I just checked....

Yeah, I think they will be the only 13-3 NFC team in that scenario.

Rodgers pulls one out of the bag, though VAR check to come... and the Fish Tank could be making B&B work the first week of January for once!

[forestfan]

Crap clock management leaves Brady needing a Hail Mary with timeouts remaining...

[blahblah]

I have Dolphin Tank on.

Pats are pants...

[forestfan]

And Fitzmagic probably gets another season, as Miami won’t be drafting in the top five...

Seems fitting that NE fail to get a bye with 12-4 this season, when they got one with 11-5 last year. They’ll piss on the offense-free Steelers if they face them, but the Tits could cause them some problems.

[blahblah]

They played pants as per Bills...

[forestfan]

Bills had nothing to play for, I presume they rested a lot of starters. Likewise Minnesota.

B*gger, we’re on last year’s thread again...