Formation and RMT
-
- Cheetah
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 12:58
- FS Record: 2000
Formation and RMT
Hi guys. So I'm quite new to this but I'm determined this season to stick at fantasy football and keep tinkering to get as high a score as possible and was wondering what you all think to what my beat starting line-up would be out of the 3 I have attached. Any advice or feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Treebeard
- Posts: 116
- Joined: 31 Jul 2017, 20:49
Re: Formation and RMT
1 is clearly better than 2, as it is the same team but with Mane over Richarlison. I personally think Auba will be excellent so it would be 3 for me. However I don't fancy Bertrand/Southampton. I'd downgrade him to Coady and upgrade Richarlison - might allow you to bring in Arnautovic or Zaha?
Sane is a rotation risk, but might pay off. Other option is B. Silva, though also a rotation risk. I'm avoiding City mids for this reason.
Sane is a rotation risk, but might pay off. Other option is B. Silva, though also a rotation risk. I'm avoiding City mids for this reason.
- Fabien
- FISOhead
- Posts: 923
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:27
- FS Record: TFF: 23rd (single entrant)
Re: Formation and RMT
Not the middle one, 1.6 m is too much to keep back. I'd probably favour 3, although I'm not a fan of Richarlison, I think 2 strikes will e better in the long term. But both solid teams.
-
- Cheetah
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 12:58
- FS Record: 2000
Re: Formation and RMT
Thanks for the input. Will tinker now. Do you think wolves will be solid at the back to include coady?
View Latest: 1 Day View Your posts