FISO

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 15:13**

Can't decide between Wilson and King.

Is King worth a gamble? Every team I see has gone for Wilson and so far King has only 17K transfers in compared to 260k! for Wilson.

Thinking of King just to be different against the crowd, he just as likely to start and has a good chance of scoring, anybody else gone for King above Wilson?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 15:21**

Fraser or Maddison for Son or Pogba?
Vardy or Wilson for Rashford?

2 FT's.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 15:54**

The Real Slim Shady wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 15:21 Fraser or Maddison for Son or Pogba?
Vardy or Wilson for Rashford?

2 FT's.

Fraser wins the first one for me. Gotta lose Son I think.

The second is more of an ‘it depends’. Do you still have your wildcard and FH? Are funds tight? Answers of yes and no respectively will favour Vardy - he’s the best pick IMO but far more likely to block off City attackers further down the line.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 16:02**

Wilson has very Wilson-friendly games in GW31 and 33.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 16:06**

Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 15:13 Can't decide between Wilson and King.

Is King worth a gamble? Every team I see has gone for Wilson and so far King has only 17K transfers in compared to 260k! for Wilson.

Thinking of King just to be different against the crowd, he just as likely to start and has a good chance of scoring, anybody else gone for King above Wilson?

Wilson has far better underlying stats.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 16:37**

Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:06
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 15:13 Can't decide between Wilson and King.

Is King worth a gamble? Every team I see has gone for Wilson and so far King has only 17K transfers in compared to 260k! for Wilson.

Thinking of King just to be different against the crowd, he just as likely to start and has a good chance of scoring, anybody else gone for King above Wilson?
Wilson has far better underlying stats.

so King not worth the gamble at all? not a Bournemouth fan but whenever I see them King looks like a good player and it will only be for two fixtures (I'm using FH in GW32) so it's basically two home games v Newcastle & Burnley, just seems like a way to create a bit of difference against other teams. Is King still the 1st choice penalty taker?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 16:43**

just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 16:52**

Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:43 just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.

This season:

Wilson xG 0.52 xA 0.24
King xG 0.39 xA 0.14

Note: King's stats are even inflated by being on pens (we don't know it but he might be off pens now) and playing as their most up front striker when Wilson was injured.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:11**

Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:52
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:43 just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.
This season:

Wilson xG 0.52 xA 0.24
King xG 0.39 xA 0.14

Note: King's stats are even inflated by being on pens (we don't know it but he might be off pens now) and playing as their most up front striker when Wilson was injured.

I know Wilson is the one who will play as the main striker but King has scored two double digit hauls while Wilson was also in the team (GW's 5 and 8) so I'd be gambling on King outscoring Wilson over GW 31 & 33, I agree Wilson looks the stronger pick but just looking where I can create a bit of variance this week as lots of teams will be very similar due to the restricted pool of players and King as an alternative to the hugely popular Wilson is just something I'm looking at. I can't see too many other situations where I can go against the template without it being a complete mismatch.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:15**

Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:11
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:52
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:43 just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.
This season:

Wilson xG 0.52 xA 0.24
King xG 0.39 xA 0.14

Note: King's stats are even inflated by being on pens (we don't know it but he might be off pens now) and playing as their most up front striker when Wilson was injured.
I know Wilson is the one who will play as the main striker but King has scored two double digit hauls while Wilson was also in the team (GW's 5 and 8) so I'd be gambling on King outscoring Wilson over GW 31 & 33, I agree Wilson looks the stronger pick but just looking where I can create a bit of variance this week as lots of teams will be very similar due to the restricted pool of players and King as an alternative to the hugely popular Wilson is just something I'm looking at. I can't see too many other situations where I can go against the template without it being a complete mismatch.

Wilson is more likely to score better in GW31 and GW33.

You can surely increase variance by picking King. That's true. You are just more likely to lose than win.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:19**

Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:15
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:11
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:52
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:43 just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.
This season:

Wilson xG 0.52 xA 0.24
King xG 0.39 xA 0.14

Note: King's stats are even inflated by being on pens (we don't know it but he might be off pens now) and playing as their most up front striker when Wilson was injured.
I know Wilson is the one who will play as the main striker but King has scored two double digit hauls while Wilson was also in the team (GW's 5 and 8) so I'd be gambling on King outscoring Wilson over GW 31 & 33, I agree Wilson looks the stronger pick but just looking where I can create a bit of variance this week as lots of teams will be very similar due to the restricted pool of players and King as an alternative to the hugely popular Wilson is just something I'm looking at. I can't see too many other situations where I can go against the template without it being a complete mismatch.
Wilson is more likely to score better in GW31 and GW33.

You can surely increase variance by picking King. That's true. You are just more likely to lose than win.

I know

but my query is how much of a risk is King? He's sure to play, and not completely useless, and maybe on pens, and it's two good home games, and he's better at home than away, so maybe a risk worth taking?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:20**

Caf wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 15:54
The Real Slim Shady wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 15:21 Fraser or Maddison for Son or Pogba?
Vardy or Wilson for Rashford?

2 FT's.
Fraser wins the first one for me. Gotta lose Son I think.

The second is more of an ‘it depends’. Do you still have your wildcard and FH? Are funds tight? Answers of yes and no respectively will favour Vardy - he’s the best pick IMO but far more likely to block off City attackers further down the line.

Yeah I was looking to bring in Fraser and Vardy too, just a little doubt over Fraser which is annoying.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:23**

Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:19
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:15
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:11
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:52
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:43 just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.
This season:

Wilson xG 0.52 xA 0.24
King xG 0.39 xA 0.14

Note: King's stats are even inflated by being on pens (we don't know it but he might be off pens now) and playing as their most up front striker when Wilson was injured.
I know Wilson is the one who will play as the main striker but King has scored two double digit hauls while Wilson was also in the team (GW's 5 and 8) so I'd be gambling on King outscoring Wilson over GW 31 & 33, I agree Wilson looks the stronger pick but just looking where I can create a bit of variance this week as lots of teams will be very similar due to the restricted pool of players and King as an alternative to the hugely popular Wilson is just something I'm looking at. I can't see too many other situations where I can go against the template without it being a complete mismatch.
Wilson is more likely to score better in GW31 and GW33.

You can surely increase variance by picking King. That's true. You are just more likely to lose than win.
I know but my query is how much of a risk is King? He's sure to play, and not completely useless, and maybe on pens, and it's two good home games, and he's better at home than away, so maybe a risk worth taking?

It is perhaps a good opportunity to increase variance because he is probably far less owned than Wilson and he can score well. It's just a definite no for me because I want to pick a player who is more likely to score better.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:34**

Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:23
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:19
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:15
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:11
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:52
Gambit wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 16:43 just found these little stats, but they don't make the decision any easier!

Callum Wilson is vying to score in four consecutive league appearances for the first time since October 2014 in the Championship.

Joshua King has scored four goals in his last four league games at home.
This season:

Wilson xG 0.52 xA 0.24
King xG 0.39 xA 0.14

Note: King's stats are even inflated by being on pens (we don't know it but he might be off pens now) and playing as their most up front striker when Wilson was injured.
I know Wilson is the one who will play as the main striker but King has scored two double digit hauls while Wilson was also in the team (GW's 5 and 8) so I'd be gambling on King outscoring Wilson over GW 31 & 33, I agree Wilson looks the stronger pick but just looking where I can create a bit of variance this week as lots of teams will be very similar due to the restricted pool of players and King as an alternative to the hugely popular Wilson is just something I'm looking at. I can't see too many other situations where I can go against the template without it being a complete mismatch.
Wilson is more likely to score better in GW31 and GW33.

You can surely increase variance by picking King. That's true. You are just more likely to lose than win.
I know but my query is how much of a risk is King? He's sure to play, and not completely useless, and maybe on pens, and it's two good home games, and he's better at home than away, so maybe a risk worth taking?
It is perhaps a good opportunity to increase variance because he is probably far less owned than Wilson and he can score well. It's just a definite no for me because I want to pick a player who is more likely to score better.

Thanks, I'll probably gamble, I've got several of the other popular key picks and the King/Wilson choice is where I thought the alternative to the popular pick wasn't as outlandish as it is in the other teams.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:43**

I've played my free hit, my team is already shite so figured I may as well enjoy this week. Might have to do something about Fraser though he's turned yellow

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:55**

Vvd Anderson out

Salah Azpil in

-4

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 17:58**

NorthBankRedemption wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:43 I've played my free hit, my team is already shite so figured I may as well enjoy this week. Might have to do something about Fraser though he's turned yellow

Take £3.9m goalkeeper instead of Schmeichel and you have £1.1m more to invest on your actual players.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 18:14**

Billy Bongo wrote:Vvd Anderson out

Salah Azpil in

-4

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 18:28**

Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:58
Take £3.9m goalkeeper instead of Schmeichel and you have £1.1m more to invest on your actual players.

i have like 7 points in the bank as it is with this lineup...if this were an actual wildcard rather than a free hit i would certainly do that

think i've got a good balance of players from teams that will do well this week and people on form

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 19:30**

Did Rashford --> Wilson with my free. Now contemplating the following for a -4:

Higuain --> Vardy

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 19:34**

Owsler wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:30 Did Rashford --> Wilson with my free. Now contemplating the following for a -4:

Higuain --> Vardy

As someone with Vardy contemplating Higuain to Wilson for a-4, I see your thinking.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 19:41**

NorthBankRedemption wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 18:28
Finisher1 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 17:58
Take £3.9m goalkeeper instead of Schmeichel and you have £1.1m more to invest on your actual players.
i have like 7 points in the bank as it is with this lineup...if this were an actual wildcard rather than a free hit i would certainly do that

think i've got a good balance of players from teams that will do well this week and people on form

If you take a base-price goalkeeper instead of Schmeichel you can upgrade Calvert-Lewin to a much better striker with a much better fixture. You don't need Schmeichel on the bench because Fabianski will play anyway.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 20:21**

raoul wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:34
Owsler wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:30 Did Rashford --> Wilson with my free. Now contemplating the following for a -4:

Higuain --> Vardy
As someone with Vardy contemplating Higuain to Wilson for a-4, I see your thinking.

why are you guys shipping Higuain?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 20:29**

slyger wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 20:21
raoul wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:34
Owsler wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:30 Did Rashford --> Wilson with my free. Now contemplating the following for a -4:

Higuain --> Vardy
As someone with Vardy contemplating Higuain to Wilson for a-4, I see your thinking.
why are you guys shipping Higuain?

He a doubt through illness and the fact Giroud got a hat trick and an assist in there last game.

Im presuming they think he maybe on the bench and Giroud given a chance to see if can take his form into the prem

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 20:30**

Stevieste wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 20:29
slyger wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 20:21
raoul wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:34
Owsler wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:30 Did Rashford --> Wilson with my free. Now contemplating the following for a -4:

Higuain --> Vardy
As someone with Vardy contemplating Higuain to Wilson for a-4, I see your thinking.
why are you guys shipping Higuain?
He a doubt through illness and the fact Giroud got a hat trick and an assist in there last game.

Im presuming they think he maybe on the bench and Giroud given a chance to see if can take his form into the prem

I did see that but presumed since Sarri brought him in that he would be first in line when fit. Guess we shall see.

Anyone fancy a punt on Arnie? I could see a lot of goals in that match

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:10**

Higuian trained today and Sarri declared him fit in presser

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:19**

slyger wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 20:30
Stevieste wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 20:29
slyger wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 20:21
raoul wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:34
Owsler wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 19:30 Did Rashford --> Wilson with my free. Now contemplating the following for a -4:

Higuain --> Vardy
As someone with Vardy contemplating Higuain to Wilson for a-4, I see your thinking.
why are you guys shipping Higuain?
He a doubt through illness and the fact Giroud got a hat trick and an assist in there last game.

Im presuming they think he maybe on the bench and Giroud given a chance to see if can take his form into the prem
I did see that but presumed since Sarri brought him in that he would be first in line when fit. Guess we shall see.

Anyone fancy a punt on Arnie? I could see a lot of goals in that match

Ive got Arnie upfront with Vardy in a 3-5-2

If was not for liverpool playing Fulham id actually make Arnie captain, could be a very big differential this week

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:25**

Doherty

Diop. Don't think I have ever spent so long analysing what ended up as a simple defender transfer.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:48**

It's not that I dislike Higuain. Just want Wilson more

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:54**

Mane not at Melwood today

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

FISO

GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00

Re: GW31 Transfers - Deadline: 16 Mar 14:00