Twas always the way. Maxwell wanting to merge Oxford and Reading - remember ? Thames Valleys Royals
What about Stan Flashman at Barnet ? Great name though.
And Notts County, bought by the millionaire that didn't exist - or did I dream that ?
Twas always the way. Maxwell wanting to merge Oxford and Reading - remember ? Thames Valleys Royals
Yeah, the guy who took Sven-Goran Eriksson to North Korea to negotiate an oil deal, after conning his way into controlling an investment bank backed by the Bahraini royal family. It sounds like a dream, but it wasn’t... the craziest thing about it was that he chose Notts County as his English football club to buy
Nah, they had loads of history to market....forestfan wrote: ↑23 Aug 2019, 23:15Yeah, the guy who took Sven-Goran Eriksson to North Korea to negotiate an oil deal, after conning his way into controlling an investment bank backed by the Bahraini royal family. It sounds like a dream, but it wasn’t... the craziest thing about it was that he chose Notts County as his English football club to buy
Well, they started in the original first division, so presumably have been relegated three or four more times than they’ve been promoted (depending on restructurings, old N/S divisions etc.)
They’ve been given until Tuesday to resolve it, still sounds tight. EFL have clarified that they will not postpone any further matches due to the fixture congestion it would cause.
We're agreeing too much lately.
Again, we can’t expect the top level to subsidise or bail out lower level clubs, just as we can’t expect Tesco to support your local corner shop that can’t cover its own costs, or takes out unaffordable loans to try and expand.quizking wrote: ↑28 Aug 2019, 00:41 And as for Bolton, they may have had a stay of execution from the EPL having been loaned some money by them (£2M) a while back, which of course they would like back. Not sure that the adminstrator accountants will be bothered by that however, if money has run out for their own fees to be paid then they can and surely will shut down the club this morning - does anyone know any different?
Horrible, horrible situations all over, and there are literally £billions sloshing around the upper reaches of football in this country ... so much for the trickle down effect.
Bolton have a 14 day reprieve. Bury had, what, two days ?forestfan wrote: ↑28 Aug 2019, 08:19 Some suggesting Bolton are getting preferential treatment as the bigger club. Surely they’re just getting the two-week extension Bury have already had, though. And every case is unique as regards the complexity of the underlying finances. It’s questionable whether Bolton’s administrators can fund them for another two weeks anyway.
Hope Bury fans can get a new club up and running quickly, though will be almost a year until they can join a league. (And no, they can’t go and watch Bury Town instead, as they play in Bury St. Edmunds, in Suffolk. They could buy them and relocate them I guess ) Getting hold of Gigg Lane before it gets sold off for development could prove the toughest ask, as it was the complexities of the ground finances that scuppered any takeover.
Oh and as for Steve Dale, apparently no interest in football or the town of Bury before he bought it. Seemingly just saw a business he could extract some money from.
Well said and the only consolation I can offer is how my club bounced back from the doom and gloom via the vision, hard graft and determination of a few people who stuck their fingers up to the powers that be.Just A Kiwi wrote: ↑28 Aug 2019, 09:43 The whole of football is infested with dodgy business practice owners and greedy agents. The EFL need to do something before more Clubs go.
The only consolation I can muster from this very sad episode is the community togetherness and spirit that tends to surface when you have phoenix club situations.
As for Sky they can do one. Countdown Clock indeed to people losing their livelihoods. A disgrace and whoever thought that a good idea needs firing. And White wearing a black tie rather than his usual bow. Crass.
seems they did a sale and leaseback on all the properties, and on a change of ownership of the lessee there is usually a clause allowing whoever bought this property to cancel the lease or demand new terms. Even if there isn't, the sale and leaseback might be fairly short. The previous owner of Bury had wanted to move to a new ground so there is a chance that the lease only has a few years on it at most. One way or another, the loan provider is likely to take ownership of the ground fairly quickly. Looks like they paid £1.6m for it, so if the valuation in the club's accounts of £5.4m is close to correct, the lender is going to make a tidy profit.blahblah wrote: ↑28 Aug 2019, 10:06 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49493929
I got as far as "complicated leasing arrangements for the ground and car parks". In theory Planning Permission coyld have gained in order to raise the value of the land.......
For an excellent account of what has been going on at Bury this article in the Guardian this morning succinctly details all the murky loan shenanigans and nepotism involved.raoul wrote: ↑28 Aug 2019, 10:02 all company accounts are viewable through Companies House. Bury:
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... ng-history
You will need to scroll down to the most recently filed Accounts which are annoyingly 2017 but they do not paint a pretty picture even then. Since then there was the change of ownership, and it looks like the entire club was mortgaged for a loan. The provider of the loan is a company whose controlling party used to be … a property developer.
Draw from that what you will.