FISO

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:02**

Going with Rondon over Wilson I think. Am I mad?

If we (Nufc) do score tomorrow (which I’m confident we will) it’s very likely that Rondon’s involved.

Since Wilson’s been the most transferred in this week shall I play it safe?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 21:29**

Fabianski
TAA Diop Rüdiger Maguire Robertson
Salah(c) Bacuna Maddison
Higuain Vardy(v)

So a 5-3-2 for me. I'd have very much liked Wilson but couldn't get him without a hit and without losing someone I want for GW32 so Doherty

Diop was my move. Huddersfield have scored two goals in their last 9 games so there has to be a good chance that pays off. Meanwhile, I quite doubt that Doherty will start twice in GW32 and the fixtures aren't great for Wolves then anyway.

It's not a FH team but at least I have 11 (hopefully).

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:02**

Late FH and currently on:

??
VvD, Rice, Diop (in order of preference)
Salah, Anderfson, Maddie, Brooks
Bobby, Vardy, King(Is he better than Wilson?)

Any advice from TP re Kaspar would be welcome

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:19**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:02 Late FH and currently on:

??

I fancy Burnley to score in a low scoring match and not many save points for the Dane . Will your budget stretch to Allison?
Edit I see now you have three Pool all ready

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:31**

Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:19
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:02 Late FH and currently on:

??

I fancy Burnley to score in a low scoring match and not many save points for the Dane . Will your budget stretch to Allison?

Obviously, lol

But no save points?

I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King

26m for subs, so Eden for Maddie is possible.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:37**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:31 I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King

26m for subs, so Eden for Maddie is possible.

You really like Brooks a.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:42**

Fraser looks set to start even though he is flagged, so one of your Brooks to Hazard and the other one to Fraser maybe?
I am not a Madisson fan really.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:43**

From4corners wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:37
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:31 I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King

26m for subs, so Eden for Maddie is possible.
You really like Brooks a.

As a future prospect, yep - but for 1 FPL GW

Bou are a FISO fave, and I am being a lemming

I kinda agree with Oxford about Burnley\Lei not being the Fox goalfest, but not sure unless TP is confident

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:44**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:31 I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King

It's a bit Brooks-heavy.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:46**

Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:42 Fraser looks set to start even though he is flagged, so one of your Brooks to Hazard and the other one to Fraser maybe?
I am not a Madisson fan really.

As above, in real life he is very impressive - but gone in latest incarnation.

Fraser to start and Brooks otb?

Wilson or King or rondon? Incresingly drinkle and about to think myself out of Vardy and go Rondon plus King\Wilson

Capt Bobby?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:46**

Pirlo's Beard wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:44
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:31 I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King
It's a bit Brooks-heavy.

Bstrd

One is Maddie, I blame the red wine

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:52**

Fabiański
Van Dijk, Rüdiger, Pereira
Salah, Hazard, Pedro, Barnes
Vardy, Wilson, Barnes

I’d like West Ham and Mané to stay quiet.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:55**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:46
Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:42 Fraser looks set to start even though he is flagged, so one of your Brooks to Hazard and the other one to Fraser maybe?
I am not a Madisson fan really.
Fraser to start and Brooks otb?

Wilson or King or rondon? Incresingly drinkle and about to think myself out of Vardy and go Rondon plus King\Wilson

Capt Bobby?

Brooks and Fraser to start I believe.
I have Rondon but in your case with the FH Wilson or King.
Firmino for captain is brave but could work out.
I went the other way and have gone Mo (c), VVD and Allison
The red wine sounds great, I think I will have a couple of glasses myself this evening.

Is there a doubt about Mane missing training this week ?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 22:58**

Close to going with:-

Fabianski (HUD)
Pereira (bur), Robertson (ful), Schindler (whm)
Mane (ful), Salah (ful), Hayden (bor), Tielemans (bur), Brooks (NEW)
Vardy (bur), Arnautovic (HUD)
(no bench)

Could get a CHE defender in for -4 and put Schindler on the bench for sub backup.

Keeping Aguero explains where most of the missing money is. Bit heavy of the away games but I think that just the way it is for the more favoured teams this gw.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:03**

Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:55
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:46
Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:42 Fraser looks set to start even though he is flagged, so one of your Brooks to Hazard and the other one to Fraser maybe?
I am not a Madisson fan really.
Fraser to start and Brooks otb?

Wilson or King or rondon? Incresingly drinkle and about to think myself out of Vardy and go Rondon plus King\Wilson

Capt Bobby?
Brooks and Fraser to start I believe.
I have Rondon but in your case with the FH Wilson or King.
Firmino for captain is brave but could work out.
I went the other way and have gone Mo (c), VVD and Allison
The red wine sounds great, I think I will have a couple of glasses myself this evening.

Is there a doubt about Mane missing training this week ?

I meant Brools om my bench

I have a Bou phobia for FF and I'm clueless re Wilson or King.

Bobby is kinda safe as he has guile etc and Fulham will be very deep, so Mane is behind Bobby and Mosa Lah for me.

I am hideously bad at time differences, unless I have the cricket on from your walking upside down place, but it is 11am(ish)?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:05**

RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:58 Close to going with:-

Fabianski (HUD)
Pereira (bur), Robertson (ful), Schindler (whm)
Mane (ful), Salah (ful), Hayden (bor), Tielemans (bur), Brooks (NEW)
Vardy (bur), Arnautovic (HUD)
(no bench)

Could get a CHE defender in for -4 and put Schindler on the bench for sub backup.

Keeping Aguero explains where most of the missing money is. Bit heavy of the away games but I think that just the way it is for the more favoured teams this gw.

Unless you want a Che defender for a few weeks it isnt worth it, imho.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:09**

Pirlo's Beard wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:44
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:31 I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King
It's a bit Brooks-heavy.

Glad to see you're the bustard and not me

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:09**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:03
I am hideously bad at time differences, unless I have the cricket on from your walking upside down place, but it is 11am(ish)?

The Cricket has been cancelled this weekend in Christchurch so I am at home for a change, and it is 12.00 lunchtime here.
The world really feels upside down today.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:11**

From4corners wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:09
Pirlo's Beard wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:44
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:31 I have moved on to:
Fab
VvD, Diop, Rice
Mosa Lah, Brooks, Almiron, Brooks
Vardy, Bobby, Wilson\King
It's a bit Brooks-heavy.
Glad to see you're the bustard and not me

Well you can be too

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:12**

Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:09
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:03
I am hideously bad at time differences, unless I have the cricket on from your walking upside down place, but it is 11am(ish)?
The Cricket has been cancelled this weekend in Christchurch so I am at home for a change, and it is 12.00 lunchtime here.
The world really feels upside down today.

All over the news here too...

But not a bad guess re time, and you cold be the 4th Incredible soon, unless you top Romyn

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:15**

Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:09
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:03
I am hideously bad at time differences, unless I have the cricket on from your walking upside down place, but it is 11am(ish)?
The Cricket has been cancelled this weekend in Christchurch so I am at home for a change, and it is 12.00 lunchtime here.
The world really feels upside down today.

It's tragic - thinking of you dude.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:18**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:12
But not a bad guess re time, and you cold be the 4th Incredible soon, unless you top Romyn

Nice to see your traditional post Christmas rise in the ranks

I am looking forward to fourth place, I might even win one or two matches.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:20**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:05
RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:58 Close to going with:-

Fabianski (HUD)
Pereira (bur), Robertson (ful), Schindler (whm)
Mane (ful), Salah (ful), Hayden (bor), Tielemans (bur), Brooks (NEW)
Vardy (bur), Arnautovic (HUD)
(no bench)

Could get a CHE defender in for -4 and put Schindler on the bench for sub backup.

Keeping Aguero explains where most of the missing money is. Bit heavy of the away games but I think that just the way it is for the more favoured teams this gw.
Unless you want a Che defender for a few weeks it isnt worth it, imho.

Would probably want one for gw33 - so I'd probably have to spend -4 anyway by then - and maybe gives me a better option for this week - Luiz instead of Schindler with the latter providing bench backup.

... I'm talking myself into it

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:20**

Oxford NZ wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:18
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:12
But not a bad guess re time, and you cold be the 4th Incredible soon, unless you top Romyn

Nice to see your traditional post Christmas rise in the ranks I am looking forward to fourth place, I might even win one or two matches.

Hmm good point, I nearly won the most wins last season, and lower is better

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:22**

RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:20
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:05
RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:58 Close to going with:-

Fabianski (HUD)
Pereira (bur), Robertson (ful), Schindler (whm)
Mane (ful), Salah (ful), Hayden (bor), Tielemans (bur), Brooks (NEW)
Vardy (bur), Arnautovic (HUD)
(no bench)

Could get a CHE defender in for -4 and put Schindler on the bench for sub backup.

Keeping Aguero explains where most of the missing money is. Bit heavy of the away games but I think that just the way it is for the more favoured teams this gw.
Unless you want a Che defender for a few weeks it isnt worth it, imho.
Would probably want one for gw33 - so I'd probably have to spend -4 anyway by then - and maybe gives me a better option for this week - Luiz instead of Schindler with the latter providing bench backup.

... I'm talking myself into it

No, no, no

I am the idiot that does shit like that - you are wise like AR

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:30**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:22
RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:20
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:05
RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 22:58 Close to going with:-

Fabianski (HUD)
Pereira (bur), Robertson (ful), Schindler (whm)
Mane (ful), Salah (ful), Hayden (bor), Tielemans (bur), Brooks (NEW)
Vardy (bur), Arnautovic (HUD)
(no bench)

Could get a CHE defender in for -4 and put Schindler on the bench for sub backup.

Keeping Aguero explains where most of the missing money is. Bit heavy of the away games but I think that just the way it is for the more favoured teams this gw.
Unless you want a Che defender for a few weeks it isnt worth it, imho.
Would probably want one for gw33 - so I'd probably have to spend -4 anyway by then - and maybe gives me a better option for this week - Luiz instead of Schindler with the latter providing bench backup.

... I'm talking myself into it
No, no, no

I am the idiot that does shit like that - you are wise like AR

Doesn't it make sense?

As I'm FHing gw32 I'll only be getting 1FT between the team I play this week and the one I play in gw33. I suspect I'll be making more than 1 transfer so why not do it now - for someone I'd like in gw33 and that provides for a better fielding this week.

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:32**

Nope, unless you can explain why you are not WC'ing in 32 and FH'ing in 33

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:38**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:32 Nope, unless you can explain why you are not WC'ing in 32 and FH'ing in 33

Can't explain it ... cos I hadn't given that one a lot of thought. BB35 and WC34 is closer than WC32 is about the level I went to

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:45**

RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:38
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:32 Nope, unless you can explain why you are not WC'ing in 32 and FH'ing in 33
Can't explain it ... cos I hadn't given that one a lot of thought. BB35 and WC34 is closer than WC32 is about the level I went to

I'm feeling all grown up

My new Meds are shockingly good

Seriously, a few pages back I explined the WC for next GW then FH after Stem or someone siad a FH after a WC was mad etc.

Briefly you can set the squad up for the season from tomorrow and then FH through the BGW, with TC the only issue?

Posted: **15 Mar 2019, 23:52**

blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:45
RomynPG wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:38
blahblah wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 23:32 Nope, unless you can explain why you are not WC'ing in 32 and FH'ing in 33
Can't explain it ... cos I hadn't given that one a lot of thought. BB35 and WC34 is closer than WC32 is about the level I went to
I'm feeling all grown up

My new Meds are shockingly good

Seriously, a few pages back I explined the WC for next GW then FH after Stem or someone siad a FH after a WC was mad etc.

Briefly you can set the squad up for the season from tomorrow and then FH through the BGW, with TC the only issue?

I might have to read all that then

I could just do the -4 which lets me field 11 - that's an ok move - and leave the decision whether to FH32 or WC32 until next week ... unless I get tempted tomorrow with the late-ish deadline time

FISO

Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31

Re: Playing GW31