Kane

Mitrović

Guðmundsson

Same for me with Richarlison. The two reasons I’m keeping him in for now is his upcoming fixtures could net a return and the lack of alternative options in that price bracket. Pereyra and Fraser are options, but both are streaky and Fraser’s fixtures aren’t appealing. There is the boom or bust Pedro, he’s good for goals but he’s a rotation risk; or perhaps Moura, he could have a big role when fit due to Kane and Son’s absences. But the options aren’t shouting out to be picked, though neither is Richarlison at the minute...
Quaner on loan to Ipswich REMOVED from game.Bixer wrote: ↑16 Jan 2019, 14:25If you haven't done this move already, it's worth noting that there were reports of a huge bust up at Fulham the other day between a couple of players (Mitrovic being one I believe) and Kamara. Ranieri is reportedly furious with Kamara and keen to see the back of him.
I'd be surprised to see him feature for them again.
Just that if you're aware he'll only ever be non-playing bench fodder, you almost might as well just bring Quaner in and save yourself an extra £0.2m. Unfortunately the cheapest playing forward is now Success at £4.6m, but even then usually only for a 1 point cameo.
Done.From4corners wrote: ↑16 Jan 2019, 19:58Tempted to do the following for -4:
KaneAgüero
MitrovićLocadia
GuðmundssonAlli
ItsSutter Kane wrote: ↑19 Jan 2019, 08:45Not 100% but very good chance. He's just miles better than anyone else in that role. Don't be surprised if he's soon injured again though.
Wanted a Spurs player with their fixtures coming up and Eriksen looks like the best option to me. Would've liked a City mid as well, but can't have everything! Kane and Sane was one of my options before Kane's injury scuppered it.
Interesting. You think I should keep Eriksen then? Probably not worth a -4 for a player who isn't as nailed on as Eriksen.
Users browsing this forum: GrapeshotCrawler and 20 guests