I realised that the Yoshida dismissal, obviously detrimental for his owners (-1p AND missed 2nd game),
had the collateral effect to make less profitable the hit I took sideways Stephens
Bednarek
Indeed, even if I don't own Yoshida, his absence brought Stephens to play 2nd game, which in all likeliness he wouldn't have
So, the pts I scored are the same, but instead of an 8p gain to justify the Hit (8p vs 0), I find myself with a mere 2p gain (8p vs 6p)
i.e. the hit didn't pay off
although, as it also had the purpose to fund Tarkowski
Smalling
it could become justified if
Bednarek 8p + Smalling 2p+? -8p ≥ Tark -1p + Stephens 6p
that is
10p + Smalling(whu) ≥ 13p
I'd need Smalling to score 3+p tomorrow to justify the Hits combo
(then I'd also need Jesus+Sterling to outscore Hazard by 4p tonite, to justify another Hit, but that's another story)