Should I take Hazard out?
- Zimmerman
- FISO Jedi Knight
- Posts: 30211
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:42
- Location: having a picnic at the Bear Mountain
- FPL:
Re: Should I take Hazard out?
I was (i think) translating Plevna's post for you
- Zimmerman
- FISO Jedi Knight
- Posts: 30211
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:42
- Location: having a picnic at the Bear Mountain
- FPL:
Re: Should I take Hazard out?
He's started two of the last four (didn't travel to Belgrade for political reasons)
Scored 1 and 2 assists in those three games.
Didn't feature midweek, liverpool looked a bit tired and leggy (plus its an 'easy' game on Sunday).
He's the go to man for Klopp (for rotation or impact sub or resting his main men).
Its not the worst idea in the world.
Someone like Barkley or Pedro is probably 'safer' but neither are nailed on better options.
Scored 1 and 2 assists in those three games.
Didn't feature midweek, liverpool looked a bit tired and leggy (plus its an 'easy' game on Sunday).
He's the go to man for Klopp (for rotation or impact sub or resting his main men).
Its not the worst idea in the world.
Someone like Barkley or Pedro is probably 'safer' but neither are nailed on better options.
-
- FISOhead
- Posts: 630
- Joined: 03 Feb 2015, 13:42
Re: Should I take Hazard out?
Yes I get you both but I’ve only 1.8mil. If Richarlison is injured then what about Lingard(just coming back and no-one else will have him) gamble I know but...
-
- FISOhead
- Posts: 630
- Joined: 03 Feb 2015, 13:42
Re: Should I take Hazard out?
Lingard anybody??
- Zimmerman
- FISO Jedi Knight
- Posts: 30211
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:42
- Location: having a picnic at the Bear Mountain
- FPL:
Re: Should I take Hazard out?
not for me.
as you say, only just coming back and they play city this weekend anyway (cue a star man 18 pointer as super sub)!
as you say, only just coming back and they play city this weekend anyway (cue a star man 18 pointer as super sub)!
View Latest: 1 Day View Your posts