Droughton wrote:
Also considering Turner of Sunderland now as his fixtures will rotate well with Santon..
Thoughts?
It depends on who you would give up for Turner (if you're giving up Raylor for Santon).
But in general, no, I think it would be difficult to pick a Sunderland defender over one of your other defenders over the next few weeks, and Turner isn't much of a scoring threat.
This is how I'd play your defense if I made no other changes (in order of clean sheet potential):
GW25: Enrique, Taylor, Senderos (Shawcross, Raylor)
GW26: Enrique, Shawcross, Santon (Senderos, Taylor)
GW27: Enrique, Santon, Senderos (Shawcross*, Taylor)
GW28: You're Screwed
GW29: Enrique, Santon, Senderos (Taylor, Shawcross)
GW30: Enrique, Taylor, Santon (Shawcross, Senderos)
*GW27 A toss up between Senderos & Shawcross really
This is based on clean sheet potential only (and assuming I'd always play Enrique), but I see Shawcross & Taylor on the bench more often than not, and so would look here first.
Sunderland have some chances through GW30 to get a cs, but your other defenders tend to have better fixtures, and so I'd be looking to build up to defend weeks GW28 & 30.
Here are some cheaper, and ideally attacking, defenders from teams who have home fixtures in GW28 & GW30;
Man Utd (WB/FU): Evans(4.5) - not really an attacking threat
Chelsea (SC/TH): Bosingwa(5.5), Cahill(5.2)
Arsenal (NU/AV): Mertesacker(5.7), Koscielny(5.8)
Sunderland (LI/QP): Bardsly(4.8)
Norwich (WA,WW): Barnett(4.0), Martin R (4.3)
Swansea (MC/EV): Rangle(4.4), Williams(5.0)
Wolves (BR/NW): Ward (4.5), Johnson(4.6)
Bolton (QP/BR): Steinsson, Wheater, Robinson, Rickets
Picking up a Norwich, Wolves or Bolton defender might give you an attacking option, but if you could get 9.7 out of Raylor & Shawcross, I think I'd be more tempted by Evans & Cahill.
Chelsea have similar (or better) matches as Stoke, you don't have any Chelsea coverage, and Cahill takes shots. And as long as Evans starts (or is even mildly rotated), his value is too great too ignore.
If it were me (and assuming similar value), I'd do:
GW25: Raylor

Evans J
GW26: Taylor

Santon
GW27: Shawcross

Cahill
Now you would have:
GW25: Evans J, Taylor, Senderos (Shawcross, Enrique)
GW26: Enrique, Shawcross, Santon (Evans J, Senderos)
GW27: Enrique, Cahill, Senderos (Santon, Evans J)
GW28: Cahill, Evans J, Senderos (Santon, Enrique)
GW29: Evans J, Santon, Senderos/Enrique (Cahill)
GW30: Enrique, Evans J, Cahill (Santon, Senderos)
This gives you two more weeks to see if Cahill becomes a full time starter, and if he doesn't, you could simply leave Shawcross alone.
Another way to do this would be:
GW25: Raylor

Evans J
GW26: Shawcross

Cahill
Leaving:
GW25: Evans J(H), Taylor(H), Senderos(H) (Shawcross(A), Enrique(A))
GW26: Enrique(H), Cahill(H), Evans J(A) (Taylor(A), Senderos(A))
GW27: Enrique(H), Cahill(H), Senderos(H) (Taylor(A), Evans J(A))
GW28: Cahill(H), Evans J(H), Senderos(A) (Taylor(H), Enrique(A))
GW29: Evans J, Senderos(H), Enrique(A) (Taylor(A), Cahill(A))
GW30: Enrique(H), Evans J(H), Cahill(H) (Taylor(H), Senderos(A))
This has you playing Evans away in GW26 (instead of Santon at home), but the Man Utd game away to Norwich is still a decent shout for a cs, and you don't have to make three defensive changes.