Ratings for Wed 20/10/2010

Jules · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 22:26

MAN UTD 1 BURSASPOR 0
STAR MAN - NANI (MAN UTD)
MAN UTD: Kuszczak 6, Rafael 6, Smalling 7, Vidic 6, Evra 7, Fletcher 6, Carrick 5, Anderson 5, Nani 8, Park 6, Macheda 5. Subs: Obertan (Park 70) 6, Hernandez (Anderson 78) 5. Not used: Amos, Neville, Berbatov, O'Shea, Bebe. Booked: Nani.

INTER MILAN 4 TOTTENHAM 3
STAR MAN - GARETH BALE (SPURS)
SPURS: Gomes 4, Hutton 5, Bassong 5, Gallas 5, Assou-Ekotto 5, Jenas 5, Modric 5, Huddlestone 5, Bale 8, Lennon 5, Crouch 5. Subs: Cudicini (Modric 11) 6, Keane (Crouch 67) 5, Palacios (Huddlestone 80) 5. Not used: Kaboul, Bentley, Pavlyuchenko, Kranjcar. Booked: Palacios. Sent off: Gomes.

inf · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09 2010 **Posts:** 320

At one stage i was dreading the minus points bale was going to get me.... how wrong was i? Good night for me, have both Bale and Nani

Nedved · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 22:31

Nani and Bale both in my Elite team

Shame Rooney is too :cry:

ronny10 · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 22:34

Yep, Nani and Bale in ALOT of teams :mrgreen:

Striker · **Joined:** Thu Oct 13 2005 **Posts:** 3706

Was pretty sure that several posters would let the world know how lucky they had been, but I didn't anticipate the speed of their anxiety to do so. :wink:

Herc6 · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 22:46

Bale, Nani, Chamakh and Nasri

lucky week

inf · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09 2010 **Posts:** 320

I'm not overly excited, I know EVERYONE who is anywhere near the top of the leaderboard has Bale and quite a few have nani too... but i'll definitely have gained some ground on the people who don't have nani. My top team was somewhere around the 3000 mark so i'm hoping with any luck i'll be in the top 1000 now.

Nedved · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 22:49

Striker wrote:

Was pretty sure that several posters would let the world know how lucky they had been, but I didn't anticipate the speed of their anxiety to do so. :wink:

Lucky

FUBU05 · **Joined:** Mon Aug 21 2006 **Posts:** 365

inf wrote:

I'm not overly excited, I know EVERYONE who is anywhere near the top of the leaderboard has Bale and quite a few have nani too... but i'll definitely have gained some ground on the people who don't have nani. My top team was somewhere around the 3000 mark so i'm hoping with any luck i'll be in the top 1000 now.

I am not so sure about this. Have been taking a look at the top 100 and I would say there are more teams without Bale in it than teams that do have him. How many points do you have if you are around the 3000 mark? I am way back in 17,000th :oops:

Nedved · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 22:51

FUBU05 wrote:

inf wrote:

I'm not overly excited, I know EVERYONE who is anywhere near the top of the leaderboard has Bale and quite a few have nani too... but i'll definitely have gained some ground on the people who don't have nani. My top team was somewhere around the 3000 mark so i'm hoping with any luck i'll be in the top 1000 now.

I am not so sure about this. Have been taking a look at the top 100 and I would say there are more teams without Bale in it than teams that do have him. How many points do you have if you are around the 3000 mark? I am way back in 17,000th :oops:

Overall leader has neither of them, ouch.

Cruel game this.

inf · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09 2010 **Posts:** 320

It's possible some people took bale out as they may have decided that he's got them a fair amount of points already and that if EVERYONE has him then if he gets injured they'd be at an advantage having someone else. Or they didn't pick him from the start and couldn't manage to squeeze him in.... probably the latter. Just the 2 teams for me. After tonight i'll have 471 points, still not enough to push me into the current top 100 that does include tonights points (lowest points are 493)

Striker · **Joined:** Thu Oct 13 2005 **Posts:** 3706

Nedved wrote:

Striker wrote:

Was pretty sure that several posters would let the world know how lucky they had been, but I didn't anticipate the speed of their anxiety to do so. :wink:

Lucky

What's your version then? They were rushing to tell us how clever they had been? :wink:

FUBU05 · **Joined:** Mon Aug 21 2006 **Posts:** 365

inf wrote:

It's possible some people took bale out as they may have decided that he's got them a fair amount of points already and that if EVERYONE has him then if he gets injured they'd be at an advantage having someone else. Or they didn't pick him from the start and couldn't manage to squeeze him in.... probably the latter. Just the 2 teams for me. After tonight i'll have 471 points, still not enough to push me into the current top 100 that does include tonights points (lowest points are 493)

Still harbouring aspirations of winning the competiton outright? I make that 24 points tonight for Bale and 13 for Nani. Does anyone else concur?

Rob45 · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 23:07

25 pts, for Bale i think.....trouble is most teams have him....but it's still a nice bonus, i was just relieved when he had scored ONE ! ( I should be on 495 pts now, so hopefully getting nearer the top 100 ! )

inf · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09 2010 **Posts:** 320

I don't think i'm going to win it, chances of winning it with just 2 teams is pretty slim.... don't have enough bases covered. I compare the SDT to trying to crack a 4 digit code; you stand a much higher chances of cracking the code the more possible combinations you enter. With just 2 teams your chances are minute.

I'd say 25 for bale and 14 for nani

Nani: 5 for the goal, 5 for the star man, 3 for mark of 7, 2 for clean sheet and -1 for yellow card.
Bale: 5 x 3 for the 3 goals, 5 for the hat-trick bonus, 3 for mark of 7 or more and -3 for conceding 4 goals.

Herc6 · **Posted:** 20 Oct 2010, 23:10

Hmm 55th for the week

Obviously not as many people as I thought have Nasri, Nani and Bale.

inf · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09 2010 **Posts:** 320

1386 for the season

was really hoping to break into the top 1000.

Rob45 · **Posted:** 21 Oct 2010, 00:14

Pos : 366 for me.

ArmChairPundit · **Joined:** Sat Jul 25 2009 **Posts:** 255

inf wrote:

I don't think i'm going to win it, chances of winning it with just 2 teams is pretty slim.... don't have enough bases covered. I compare the SDT to trying to crack a 4 digit code; you stand a much higher chances of cracking the code the more possible combinations you enter. With just 2 teams your chances are minute.

I'd say 25 for bale and 14 for nani

Nani: 5 for the goal, 5 for the star man, 3 for mark of 7, 2 for clean sheet and -1 for yellow card.
Bale: 5 x 3 for the 3 goals, 5 for the hat-trick bonus, 3 for mark of 7 or more and -3 for conceding 4 goals.

i switched the radio off at 4 - 1, only to read the ratings he got a hatrick..... sweet.

Striker · **Joined:** Thu Oct 13 2005 **Posts:** 3706

ArmChairPundit wrote:

i switched the radio off at 4 - 1.

Thats the problem with the young today, not bottle or staying power. I blame the welfare state. :wink:

ArmChairPundit · **Joined:** Sat Jul 25 2009 **Posts:** 255

not out of protest or owt not a spurs fan but theres only so much much of talk sport i can stand

The MelonPopper · **Posted:** 21 Oct 2010, 19:57

I bet you don't see ratings like that too often. Bale gets 8 and star man and the rest of the team get 4s, 5s and one 6 :shock:

Thought he might even get a 10, but I guess them losing prevents that.

He was impressive last night and I didn't know he had a throw on him like Rory Delap :shock:

Zimmerman · **Posted:** 22 Oct 2010, 12:52

Striker wrote:

Nedved wrote:

Striker wrote:

Was pretty sure that several posters would let the world know how lucky they had been, but I didn't anticipate the speed of their anxiety to do so. :wink:

Lucky

What's your version then? They were rushing to tell us how clever they had been? :wink:

Well I've got a defence of Agger, Faubert, Da Silva and Djorou.
Am I unlucky or stupid?

SUZYKINS · **Posted:** 22 Oct 2010, 12:56

Zimmerman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Nedved wrote:

Striker wrote:

Was pretty sure that several posters would let the world know how lucky they had been, but I didn't anticipate the speed of their anxiety to do so. :wink:

Lucky

What's your version then? They were rushing to tell us how clever they had been? :wink:

Well I've got a defence of Agger :shock:

, Faubert

, Da Silva :shock:

and Djorou :shock:

.
Am I unlucky or stupid?

Do you want to buy some magic beans Zimm ?

Striker · **Joined:** Thu Oct 13 2005 **Posts:** 3706

Zimmerman wrote:

Striker wrote:

Nedved wrote:

Striker wrote:

Was pretty sure that several posters would let the world know how lucky they had been, but I didn't anticipate the speed of their anxiety to do so. :wink:

Lucky

What's your version then? They were rushing to tell us how clever they had been? :wink:

Well I've got a defence of Agger, Faubert, Da Silva and Djorou.
Am I unlucky or stupid?

A fibber?

Although if you really have that defence, I'll take the Fifth.

STINKYGOLDFISH · **Posted:** 23 Oct 2010, 09:53

Herc6 wrote:

Bale, Nani, Chamakh and Nasri

lucky week

Lol hello Herc. Go a bit quieter on Bale mate, i got him. :wink:

Ratings for Wed 20/10/2010

Who is online