padmole wrote:
Weeks like this are when the reverse is appropriate.
In the US there is a top field with any one capable.
However in Europe there is a much weaker field. ANy good players "Should" come to the fore.
However what everyone tends to do is put in their BEST players as opposed to the best players to score points.
For example - why dont you pick 10 players for the US event and see how they compare to my 10 for europe
My European selections being
JM Singh, Dredge, Schwartzel, P Hanson, Dougherty, A Hansen, F Molinari, S Hansen, McLardy, P Lawrie.
Total cost of the 10 being less than £9 mill. Agreed that you cant play them all but you score as many points this week for there performance as you will for the US stars.
CHALLENGE ON - ANY TAKERS!!!!
OK: Woods, Singh, Mickelson, Furyk, Donald, Els, Goosen, Scott, Sabbatini, Johnson.
They should all be in the top 20!
PS Which Lawrie for you?
Edit - or do mine have to be less than £9million too?

My Superstars beat your run-of-the-millers, but not by that much (by 102 to 72 using OFL scoring, I reckon). Entirely because of Vijay, Woods, Mickelson and Sabbatini, though - the rest were pants. Dougherty, McClardy and Molinari were your performers.