For the last six games he has averaged 7.8 points. My rivals have him. If I get rid of Moses I have 6.8, so can still afford him, but only for another week or so and then he's out of range unless I want to get rid of Dempsey or Bale.
WhyI won't do it:
1) I want to differentiate - I hate to imagine my friends' teams and mine being even more similar. So far this season I've differentiated with Sturridge (

), Moses (

), Sinclair (

) and a cheapo defense that did OK. I like the feeling and it makes matchdays more fun.
2) Tactical reasons - Sunderland look to me like a counter-attacking team under MON, and they've racked up the points mostly against teams that try to keep possession - Swansea, Man City, Chelsea, Wigan. Their next four, while looking good on paper, are against other sides that like to play on the counter - they host Norwich and Arsenal and travel to Stoke and West Brom.
3) I just don't see him averaging 8 points per game for much longer. That would be RVP territory.
So instead I'm looking to do Ferguson -> Sigurdsson or Ben Arfa, leaning towards Sig because of set pieces. And because even though Ben Arfa did alright, Newcastle conceded 5 and Pardew might want to change things. Ideally though, the change would be for Hatem to play behind the striker.
That's it. If anyone has a reason I should still get Sess, please tell me now.
there was already a thread on Ben Arfa vs Sigurdsson here but I didn't want to usurp it with my essay.