I think that looks a strong squad.
There is very little to criticise here. I'll try and offer a few constructive points.
Clark vs CaulkerYou look like you have a defence of nailed on starters (Shotton is the only iffy one) but presumably you are looking to play Jones + Kompany + A.N. other.
Caulker over Clark will save 0.7m. Swansea and Newcastle have near perfect home & away fixture sync. It makes your 3rd defender choice somewhat easier if you are guaranteed a home defender to choose from. (i.e Simpson and Caulker)
LindegaardThe problem with having Lindegaard is that it takes up 1 of your 3 Man United places. I am looking well in advance here - but looking at Man United for gameweeks 28-35 you would probably want to have something like Rooney-Nani-Jones (Jones you have already) for that stretch of games. Having Lindegaard means that you can only have 2 united outfield players - one of which is already Jones, another defender.
You are playing it by ear and waiting until after the United game with Newcastle but even if he does appear tonight I question the likelyhood of him playing every game this season.
As an alternative I think that it's hard to look past Mingolet at 4.3m.
LiverpoolDifferentials. No doubt about it. You do not need to be told about the risk/reward theory behind differentials.
Liverpool are so indifferent (and expensive). Both Bellamy and Gerrard are good punts if they come off. If you do not own them - their ownership %'s are so low you might not lose ground if you miss a goal or two from them.
The only Liverpool player worth going for is Saurez but of course that is not an option anymore!
I think that Clint Dempsey is a better buy at 8.5m with 7.6% ownership. Dempsey (and Caulker) would free up some cash for an upgrade..
ConclusionVorm -
MingoletKompany - Jones - Simpson - Shotton -
CaulkerBale - Moses - Valencia - Silva -
DempseyAde - RVP - Yak
possibly enough money now for
Yak

Sturridge?
Moses

Sess?
Valencia

Nani?
Adebayor

Rooney/Aguero?
Although Moses is the perfect out of position midfielder to free up cash and an easy bench decision. I would keep him.
I hope this helps or at least gives you some fresh ideas.
Good luck.